Every so often you read something in the newspapers that literally makes you choke on your Cornflakes (and I am correct in my use of the world literal). On page 16 of today's Australian Financial Review there is an article by my old boss Neil Shoebridge that discusses Channel Seven's deal to distribute TiVo personal video recorders (DVR) in Australia next year. The deal is somewhat remarkable, in that in the US it has been the network TV operators that have been seen to suffer most from the TiVo's ad-skipping technologies.
What is really remarkable is the following quote from Seven's commercial director Bruce McWilliam: "I don't think anyone [with a DVR] will want to fast forward through the ads."
No, of course not, why would we ....?
What planet is this again ....?
If the current media revolution is telling us one thing (and reality it is telling us many things) it is that people hate being shouted at. And yet this is what network television has been doing to us for decades (once again, sometimes literally). So I ask you - who out there, when given acess to an easy mechanism to eliminate the hours of banal advertising that is choking network television, will not take that choice?
The story also quotes Seven's director of digital media Rohan Lund as saying that TV viewing is 20 to 25 percent higher in those households, and that brand recall from advertisements in DVR-equipped households is actually higher than in those without them. These figures are backed by the research company Millward Brown. My own experience of having a Foxtel iQ is counter to this, but then I am only a sample of one.
Maybe then what the networks need to do is stop stuffing their schedules with 30 second ad spots and just run them all at 30 times normal speed. Apparently brand recall would not suffer, and we'd all be better off.
Recent Comments